Washington ExaminerSig. 6OpinionAITechnologyForeign
An op-ed argues the primary AI threat to the U.S. is not losing to China but adopting Beijing-style top-down controls through proposed safety rules and government gatekeeping. It contends that China excels at scaling existing technology while the U.S. advantage lies in decentralized architectural innovation, which broad safety mandates would undermine.
Washington ExaminerSig. 6OpinionAIDefenseEnergy
The op-ed argues that data centers are central to U.S. military, economic, and political security and urges President Trump to treat their expansion as a Cold War-style contest with China. It recommends federal siting, a data-centers czar, and messaging from national-security officials to overcome local and state resistance.
Fox NewsSig. 7OpinionAIEnergyForeign
The opinion piece argues that the United States must maintain AI leadership and keep building data center infrastructure to compete with China, while acknowledging communities' legitimate concerns about costs, water, noise, and local benefits. It calls for clear responsibilities and dependable rules so development can proceed with community engagement rather than around them.
National ReviewSig. 7OpinionAIEconomyTechnology
The article argues that anxiety over artificial intelligence is pushing American policymakers toward regulation and government control that would undermine capitalism. It endorses Mark Zuckerberg’s optimistic pro-AI essay and warns that abandoning free-market principles would be a mistake, especially as Beijing advances.
New York PostSig. 7NewsAITechnologyMedia
The article traces how Effective Altruism-linked billionaires, including Sam Bankman-Fried and Dustin Moskovitz, funded Anthropic and an ecosystem of AI safety labs and journalism programs. It argues this network amplifies Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s safety-first message while critics call it a tactic to capture regulation and control the AI narrative.
New York PostSig. 6NewsAIPoliticsTechnology
Joe Rogan said on his podcast that he hopes AI could eventually take over government and foreign-policy functions, including decisions about military conflict, to prevent wars. The article pairs his proposal with Republican official Amy Kremer's rejection, arguing that machines lack moral judgment and that human accountability must remain. It also notes broader debate over AI authority and the Trump administration's push to adopt AI in national security while keeping human command responsibility.
New York PostSig. 5OpinionAIEnergyLaw
An editorial roundup excerpts conservative commentary attacking Effective Altruism and AI-safety regulation, favoring lawsuits over bureaucracy, arguing data centers should pay for their own power, defending Sydney Sweeney from progressive backlash, and urging Jews to confront antisemitism. The item is opinion and advances a right-leaning, market-oriented and culture-war framing.
New York PostSig. 6OpinionAIPolitics
An editorial attacks Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and the Effective Altruism movement, arguing their push to oversee AI safety is a hubristic, left-leaning 'cult' that should not set AI rules. It cites the movement's ties to Sam Bankman-Fried and Democratic donations as evidence of its flawed ethics.
Fox NewsSig. 7NewsAIPoliticsElections
The article reports that prominent Democrats, including Barack Obama, are now urging slower frontier AI development after earlier promoting the technology’s potential. It emphasizes White House claims that the timing of this safety push is aimed at influencing the midterm elections.
New York PostSig. 3OpinionAIPoliticsEconomy
An opinion roundup argues AI is already benefiting farmers and that resistance to it is misguided, while mocking LA progressive tree policy and AI doomerism. It criticizes figures like Elizabeth Warren and Nithya Raman and calls for Congress to support agricultural AI.
Washington ExaminerSig. 6NewsAIElectionsPolitics
David Sacks, co-chair of Trump’s science and technology advisory council, called recent AI doomsday warnings from Anthropic and OpenAI a political hoax ahead of the midterm elections. He argued that AI companies are deflecting responsibility for their products and that existing liability, regulatory, and legal systems are sufficient. The article largely presents Sacks’s claims without counterbalancing voices from the AI companies or safety advocates.
Washington ExaminerSig. 5NewsEnergyAIPolitics
The newsletter leads with an interview with Rep. Gabe Evans defending his Ratepayer Protection Act for data-center energy costs and rejecting Democratic calls for a data-center ban, warning bans would cede AI infrastructure to China. It also notes a bipartisan committee vote, a new Big Tech energy alliance, and polling on data-center concerns.