Washington ExaminerSig. 7NewsAIPoliticsTechnology
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed an executive order to accelerate California AI oversight, including consideration of a “kill switch” for AI models. The article reports Newsom’s action alongside criticism from skeptics, a blocked GOP “kill switch” proposal, and Trump’s warning that anti-AI backlash could benefit China.
Washington ExaminerSig. 6OpinionAIPoliticsForeign
The article attacks an alliance of Bernie Sanders, Steve Bannon, and Randi Weingarten opposing AI development, arguing their proposals would cede AI leadership to China. It praises Trump and Speaker Johnson for resisting over-regulation and frames anti-AI activism as anti-progress and a gift to the Chinese Communist Party.
Fox NewsSig. 7NewsAIPoliticsTechnology
Republican lawmakers are split over how to regulate AI as tech CEOs warn of existential risks. Some GOP lawmakers are questioning Big Tech's motives and dismissing the push for swift regulation as a 'false sense of urgency.'
New York PostSig. 6NewsAIEnergyPolitics
A lone Senate Democrat, Martin Heinrich, blocked fast-track consideration of a bipartisan House-passed data center power cost bill. Heinrich argued the Ratepayer Protection Act did not go far enough and pushed his own stronger grid-cost measure, but a Republican senator objected, leaving both stalled amid midterm-election fights over AI data centers.
Wall Street JournalSig. 6OpinionAIForeignPolitics
An opinion piece argues against pausing AI development through a U.S.-China agreement, saying China's AI progress cannot be verified without intrusive access and that such a deal would be a risky leap of faith. It invokes Reagan's "trust, but verify" to criticize Peggy Noonan's call for a Trump-Xi AI safety summit.
Washington ExaminerSig. 7OpinionAILawPolitics
The article argues that recent incidents where AI agents exceeded evaluation boundaries show current regulatory reporting thresholds are inadequate. It proposes a confidential federal reporting system modeled on aviation and healthcare safety reporting, allowing industry participants to flag near misses and unexpected capabilities so regulators can spot patterns without relying on centralized police-patrol oversight.
Washington ExaminerSig. 5OpinionAITechnologyPolitics
This op-ed argues that current warnings about an AI apocalypse are the latest in a century of exaggerated existential scares, from McCarthyism and peak oil to climate catastrophism and COVID restrictions. It contends such fearmongering fuels overregulation, threatens liberty and economic freedom, and could cede technological leadership to China.
Fox NewsSig. 7OpinionAITechnologyForeign
An opinion piece argues the U.S. must build AI data centers rather than impose moratoriums, warning that failing to do so cedes AI leadership, data, intellectual property, and security-standard-setting to China and other rivals. It cites foreign incentives for cloud and data-center investment while treating domestic backlash as a dangerous repeat of past offshoring mistakes.
Fox NewsSig. 7NewsAILawPolitics
The CEOs of Flock Safety and three other AI surveillance companies are set to testify before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on Sept. 23 about privacy concerns tied to AI-powered camera networks that track Americans' movements. The hearing, titled 'Always Watching: Flock’s Nationwide AI Surveillance Network,' follows calls from lawmakers and governors for investigations into alleged privacy violations.
Washington ExaminerSig. 5OpinionAIPoliticsTechnology
The op-ed argues Trump is correct to reject AI doomsaying and heavy regulation, framing the debate as a choice between free-market capitalism and socialist government control. It praises Trump’s stance against Big Tech and China while warning that overregulation would cede AI leadership to autocrats.
The HillSig. 5OpinionAIPoliticsTechnology
An opinion piece argues that partisan fighting over AI safety is unproductive, criticizing the left for opposing AI due to hostility to Trump and endorsing Trump's stance that the U.S. must not cede AI leadership to China. It also notes right-wing dismissal of safety concerns and a conspiracy theory blaming Israel.
Washington ExaminerSig. 6OpinionAIPoliticsTechnology
The piece argues that major AI companies and Democratic leaders are aligning to push AI regulation, which the author says benefits Big Tech through higher barriers to entry and Democrats through expanded government control. It casts the regulatory push as a recurring corporate-government collusion that harms competition and the public.